Exercise 2.5.2. Given the incidence matrix from exercise 2.5.1 and any vector
in the column space of
show that
. Prove the same result based on the rows of
. What is the implication for the potential differences around a loop?
Answer: From exercise 2.5.1 we have the incidence matrix
If is in the column space of
then we have
for some set of scalar coefficients ,
, and
so that
We then have
We therefore have for all vectors
in the column space of
.
Turning to the rows of if
we have
which corresponds to the system of equations
We then have
We also have
so that
The 3 by 3 incidence matrix represents a graph with three nodes and three edges and hence one loop. Each node of the graph is represented by a column of
and each edge by a row of
. The first row represents edge 1 from node 2 to node 1 (i.e., leaving node 2 and entering node 1). The second row represents edge 2 from node 3 to node 2. The third row represents edge 3 from node 3 to node 1.
If the vector represents potentials at the nodes (
at node 1,
at node 2, and
at node 3) then
is the potential difference along edge 1 (from node 2 to node 1),
is the potential difference along edge 2 (from node 3 to node 2) and
is the potential difference along edge 3 (from node 3 to node 1). From the equations above we see that the sum of the potential differences around the loop is zero (Kirchoff‘s Voltage Law).
NOTE: This continues a series of posts containing worked out exercises from the (out of print) book Linear Algebra and Its Applications, Third Edition by Gilbert Strang.
If you find these posts useful I encourage you to also check out the more current Linear Algebra and Its Applications, Fourth Edition, Dr Strang’s introductory textbook Introduction to Linear Algebra, Fourth Edition
and the accompanying free online course, and Dr Strang’s other books
.